Monday, December 23, 2019
The Morality of Lying in Contrast to the Philosophies of...
The young girl gazes at you helplessly from within the tangled wreckage. You witnessed the crash ââ¬â a massive truck careened into a minivan as it passed on the highway, killing the driver on impact, and virtually tearing the girl in half. Now she hangs from the car, held together by the seatbelt. Her nervous system critically damaged, she canââ¬â¢t feel much pain, but she knows that her situation is not optimal, to say the least. She is six years old ââ¬â she probably doesnââ¬â¢t understand the concept of death. As you stare equally helplessly into her fear stricken eyes, the only words that you can muster are: ââ¬Å"Donââ¬â¢t worry, everything will be okay.â⬠This is obviously a lie ââ¬â there is absolutely no chance that the dying girl will indeed survive andâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦For this paper, it is necessary to distinguish several of those forms, which vary in severity. First, there is the simple white lie, which is defined as ââ¬Å"a trivial lie that is told for diplomatic or well-intentioned reasons.â⬠These are typically inconsequential responses made in an effort to preserve oneââ¬â¢s feelings, such as in the clichà © case of a spouse asking, ââ¬Å"Do these jeans make me look fat?â⬠They rarely have any lasting effect, and are, for this argument, considered moot. On the other side of the scale is the outright lie, also known as deception, which is ââ¬Å"a sender intentionally trying to get someone to believe something that the sender knows to be falseâ⬠(Gass Seiter, 1999). These lies are the sort that have most often garnered scorn, as they are typically malevolent (or at the very least, selfis h), and utilized to serve a personal end. We will see that this is not always the case, but for the sake of argument, the ââ¬Å"outright lieâ⬠will begin as an evil. Lying, as a whole, is perceived negatively, because it is most commonly used in negative instances because the sender wants to protect themselves from pain and embarrassment. It is the attempt to avoid punishment or retribution that spurns most people to lie, and therefore, the concept of speaking such an untruth became associated with the consequences of something injurious, and is frowned upon. TheShow MoreRelatedJustification for Kantââ¬â¢s Moral and Ethical Views in A Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals1639 Words à |à 7 PagesImmanual Kant, unlike David Hume, aimed to establish an absolute system of morality based upon reason. Kantââ¬â¢s conceptions regarding what is moral and how someone should behave ethically, are often seen as contradictions to those proposed by Hume, who holds an empirical s tance. As mentioned, Kant emphasizes the necessity of basing morality on a priori principles; he puts faith in the power of human rationality and believed that reason alone, not feeling, is a key to advancing human morality. An ethicalRead MoreKant s The Categorical Imperative875 Words à |à 4 PagesKant believed that good intentions count. He also thought that the morality of an action is determined by the intentions behind it rather than its consequences. Kant tells that courage isnââ¬â¢t good by itself, but good when combined with good intentions. In Kantââ¬â¢s eyes, consequences are irrelevant to assessments of moral worth. He believed the only appropriate motive for moral action is a sense of duty. Sense of duty is doing something solely because it is the right thing to do, not just acting purelyRead MoreDescribe the Main Principles of the Two Normative Ethical Theories of Deontology and Utilitarianism. Compare and Contrast the Two Theories, Bringing Out Any Problems or Limitations You See in Each.1652 Words à |à 7 PagesDescribe the main principles of the two normative ethical theories of deontology and utilitarianism. Compare and contrast the two theories, bringing out any problems or limitations you see in each. Bioethics Essay â⬠¢ Intro: Define ethics and define and introduce the two theories. (philosophical theoriesâ⬠¦) â⬠¢ Utilitarianism- example â⬠¢ Deontology- example- compare â⬠¢ comparing- evaluating and critically analyzing*- similarities and differences. â⬠¢ Limitations and positives* Read MoreKantian Ethics and Christian Ethics1400 Words à |à 6 PagesKantian Ethics and Christian Ethics Immanuel Kant the founder of the Categorical Imperative (CI) argues that morality is based on standards of rationality. Therefore, to act in disaccord with the CI is to act irrationally or immorally. In comparison to Christianity, to act immorally is to act in disagreement with Gods laws. Kants CI is formulated into three different ways, which include: The Universal Law Formulation, The Humanity or End in Itself Formulation, and The Kingdom of Ends FormulationRead MoreAssiginment 1 Ethical1713 Words à |à 7 PagesWeather or not making the right choice could result in any consequences. Two ethical theories that will be discussed and compared that are relevant to Mikeââ¬â¢s situation are Kantââ¬â¢s ethics, the concept of morality acting of good will and duty. Also, the theory of Utilitarianism an ethical philosophy meaning ââ¬Ëactions is morally right if consequences of the actions lead to happinessââ¬â¢ (Stuart, 2009). These two important theories will be analyzed and discuss in the relevance to Mikes options, for his situationRead MoreThe Moral Dispute Of John Stuart Mill And Immanuel Kant1500 Words à |à 6 Pagesand argument will be explored further in this review along with the works of some of his successors. The Moral Dispute John Stuart Mill vs Immanuel Kant Philosopher John Stuart Millââ¬â¢s theory highlights utilitarianism and Kantian theory would be the total opposite. Millââ¬â¢s position links happiness with morality and focused solely on the outcomes of an action. Philosopher John Kantââ¬â¢s theory emphasizes the importance of rationality, reliability, and neutrality with highlights onRead MoreMax Weber s Politics As A Vocation860 Words à |à 4 Pagesdifferent tasks of politics can only be solved by violenceâ⬠, stated Max Weber in his lecture ââ¬Å"Politics as a Vocationâ⬠(Weber 4). In order to participate in politics, an individual will inevitably encounter times when they must break with traditional morality. An ethic of ultimate ends is not realistic or plausible for the field of politics, particularly when it is followed steadfastly. An ethic of responsibility is more compatible with politics, as it allows the response to a situation to be determinedRead MoreAn Exposition of Kants, Arendts, and Mills Moral Philosophy2785 Words à |à 12 PagesArendtââ¬â¢s, and Millââ¬â¢s Moral Philosophy Immanuel Kant adheres to Deontological ethics. His theory offers a view of morality based on the principle of good will and duty. According to him, people can perform good actions solely by good intentions without any considerations to consequences. In addition, one must follow the laws and the categorical imperative in order to act in accordance with and from duty. Several other philosophers such as Hannah Arendt discuss Kantââ¬â¢s moral philosophy. In her case study:Read MoreIs Kantian Moral Philosophy Inferior?2034 Words à |à 9 PagesKantian Moral Philosophy Superior To Utilitarianism And Feminist Ethics? Kantianism, Utilitarianism and Feminist ethics are the three main theories in the field of morality. The assumptions and arguments made by the respective theories vary in their approach. This paper examines the different theories and highlights the strength and weakness of each with examples. The goal of this paper is to support my claim that Kantianism provides a more substantive answer to the question of morality and goodRead MoreAn Exposition of Kantââ¬Å¡Ãâà ´s, Arendtââ¬Å¡Ãâà ´s, and Millââ¬Å¡Ãâà ´s Moral Philosophy2808 Words à |à 12 PagesArendtââ¬â¢s, and Millââ¬â¢s Moral Philosophyà Immanuel Kant adheres to Deontological ethics. His theory offers a view of morality based on the principle of good will and duty. According to him, people can perform good actions solely by good intentions without any considerations to consequences. In addition, one must follow the laws and the categorical imperative in order to act in accordance with and from duty. Several other philosophers such as Hannah Arendt discuss Kantââ¬â¢s moral philosophy. In her case study:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.